Existing Treatment Systems
Managing sanitary waste has been a concern since the earliest settled civilizations. Historically, wastewater was discharged into the nearest waterways, taking advantage of dilution and oxidation as treatment. This idea of “self-purification” was not incorrect; many contaminants can be removed by natural processes with sufficient exposure, time, and dilution. However, population growth, and an increase in contaminants in wastewater, have rendered this approach inadequate. The discovery of water-borne illnesses resulted in sanitation development with the goal to separate wastewater from drinking water to protect human health. ref Many treatment systems have since been developed to reduce raw human waste from entering oceans. Below is an introduction to common wastewater treatment systems used today.
Centralized Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) and Sewers
Densely populated areas and industrialized cities primarily rely on centralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to receive and treat sewage. Intricate networks of underground sewer pipes bring sewage from homes and buildings to the WWTP using gravity and pumps. These large facilities are expensive to build, run, and maintain. Technologies and treatment capacities of these systems are rarely upgraded after initial investments and often do not have the capacity to properly maintain function. This is also true for sewer pipes, which are subject to frequent leaks and overflows. Establishing sewer pipe infrastructure is expensive, especially outside of densely populated urban areas. There is also an increasing risk of malfunction induced by increased rainfall, rising water tables, and sea levels. In addition to initial construction costs, maintenance, and upgrades to this extensive infrastructure are costly, and typically the responsibility of a municipality or local government.
Large cities generate not only large volumes of sewage, but stormwater as well (combined they are considered wastewater). In areas lacking the absorption and retention that soils, grasslands, forests, and other natural features offer, precipitation has nowhere to go, so it flows over impervious surfaces, accumulating debris and contaminants, resulting in polluted urban runoff. In response, many cities built combined sewers to collect and transport stormwater to the same centralized wastewater treatment plants as sewage. While this seems efficient, it increases the vulnerability of all components of the system. Storms and even light rain often exceed the capacity of pipes, holding tanks, and treatment systems, leading to large discharges of untreated wastewater, including raw sewage, into waterways. In the United States, 40 million people are served by combined sewers, which discharge over 3 trillion liters of untreated sewage and stormwater runoff annually in combined sewer overflow (CSO) events. ref
Watch the Wastewater 101 Webinar for more information on wastewater management:
Once sewage arrives at a WWTP, it undergoes several stages of treatment before discharge.
- Primary, or physical, treatment begins with screening: sewage is passed through screens to remove large solids. Effluent is then brought to settling tanks where gravity helps to settle out additional suspended solids.
- Secondary, or biological, treatment aims to remove organic matter from sewage before disinfection. Oxygen and microorganisms are used to catalyze and promote biochemical reactions that break down contaminants. This process models natural systems and is made more efficient by aeration or exposure to additional oxygen. Oxygen is necessary for decomposition, and aeration helps eliminate dissolved gases. These reactions eventually encourage remaining particles to settle out. Common techniques for biological treatment include trickling filters and activated sludge, which increase the surface area available to microorganisms, as well as their density.
- Tertiary, or chemical, treatment is used to promote further settling and nutrient removal. Added polymers attract pollutants to create clumps while carbon or charcoal filters catalyze physical adsorption to reduce nutrients.
- Finally, effluent is disinfected to neutralize any remaining pathogens. While chlorine is one of the most common disinfectants, UV or ozone may be preferred to minimize residual chemical concentrations. ref
Primary and secondary treatment are required in some countries and the number of facilities incorporating tertiary treatment is increasing. ref However, even where treatments are required, failures are common and it should not be assumed that laws in place indicate adequate treatment. In addition, limitations on nutrient concentrations in effluent are being implemented at municipal and facility levels to address nutrient loading and the resulting eutrophication. Treatment criteria are helpful, but not enough to protect marine ecosystems from pollution.
Decentralized Treatment Systems
Onsite wastewater treatment systems (also known as non-sewered sanitation) are localized, small-scale systems for managing human waste where centralized systems are either inappropriate or have not been constructed. Hydrology, geology, and geography (as well as finances, politics, and regulations) can dictate whether a sewer and centralized system are possible or if onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) are more suitable. Areas with dispersed residences, shallow soils, impervious bedrock, or vulnerable water tables are often served by OWTS. These systems can be costly for individual homeowners, however in some places installation and maintenance costs can be reduced by subsidies or local incentives.
Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) collect, treat, and discharge wastewater effluent at the site where it is generated. Many types of onsite treatment systems exist, but the following three types are the widely used globally:
- Cesspools, which have just one containment and treatment step. Here, dug or built pits collect effluent for natural settling and treatment. The pits may be lined or unlined with a barrier that provides minimal separation from soil and groundwater. Cesspools are shown to be ineffective, provide inadequate treatment, and are being phased out, replaced, and even disallowed in many places.
- Septic systems typically contain a holding tank for wastewater and a dispersal method to provide additional treatment for effluent as it is discharged. As well as capturing raw waste, tanks promote settling and anaerobic treatment. An additional aerobic tank chamber is becoming more common to enhance biological treatment and nutrient removal, and some septic systems even have recirculation pumps to move effluent between the aerobic and anaerobic environments. Dispersal is critical for slowing the flow of effluent into the environment.
- Drain fields are a dispersal technique that promote opportunities for additional treatment of effluent by microorganisms in soil, gravel or other materials before discharge into the ground or surface waters.
The video below from The Nature Conservancy Long Island provides a more detailed explanation of septic and cesspool systems.
Another onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) option is container-based systems, which similarly collect and store wastewater on site, then require waste to be transported elsewhere for treatment. These systems are predominantly found in areas with limited infrastructure and include pit latrines, which need to be emptied once they are full, and bucket toilets, which are emptied daily. Treatment of waste collected from container-based options ranges from the conventional treatment processes outlined above, to new resource recovery practices, to no treatment at all. Successful container-based options are described in more detail in Emerging Solutions.
Septic systems and cesspools are not designed to address nutrients and are inadequate in removing them from effluent and may be hazardous for marine environments in coastal areas. Although there have been many technology advances to address nutrient removal in OWTS, there is a lack of regulation on nutrients in wastewater effluent globally. Overlooked leaks and malfunctions cause nonpoint source pollution which is difficult to detect and lacks consequences for noncompliance, leaving little opportunity for enforcement. Upgrades to OWTS systems to include enhanced nutrient reduction are demonstrating more cost efficiency than building new, large-scale wastewater treatment facilities.
Sanitation infrastructure is constrained by topography of a region. Floating areas, floodplains, impermeable soils, and coastal zones can make it difficult to implement many systems. See the case study from Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia and Lake Indawgyi, Myanmar describing the development and implementation of Handypods by Wetlands Work.
After treatment from either centralized or decentralized systems, treated effluent is discharged directly to nearby water bodies or into the ground. Outfall pipes are used to discharge effluent directly into rivers and oceans, while drain fields, soils, wetlands, and vegetation slow percolation of effluent into groundwaters. Contamination to oceans caused by wastewater effluent is dependent on both the level of treatment it receives prior to discharge and the discharge strategy used. Advanced nutrient reduction techniques and nature-based solutions can achieve additional treatment and slow the flow of effluent. The case study from Santiago in the Dominican Republic demonstrates great success in using constructed wetlands to reduce the organic pollutants discharged to the watershed.
On the other hand, discharge of inadequately treated sewage presents increased hazards for human, organism, and ecosystem health. While large-scale treatment plants in coastal areas often discharge treated or raw effluent directly into the ocean, sewage pollution from smaller containment systems also occurs, through groundwater discharge and leaching, often going unnoticed. See the case study from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, East Africa to combat the issue of pit latrine contents being dumped into the environment.
Considerations for System Selection
Infrastructure, resources, geology, population size, social and cultural norms, and politics all influence the selection of wastewater treatment systems. This selection is highly location specific, and centralized systems can in fact be less effective at a higher expense in many places. For example, a WWTP is suitable in areas with high structural and population density, existing pipe networks (or the resources and suitable geology to install them successfully), and capacity for highly technical maintenance. Alternatively, OWTS are more appropriate where piped sewers do not exist and there is more distance between sources of wastewater (homes, businesses, etc.). Existing wastewater infrastructure influences system suitability, as upgrades can often be easier and more cost effective to implement than development of new infrastructure. See these case studies of work to centralize wastewater treatment on the island of Rotan, Honduras and Bonaire.
Decision support tools for selecting the best system based on local contexts are lacking, making it difficult to adequately manage wastewater pollution and sanitation needs. Considerations for system selection should include existing infrastructure, community resources, social and cultural expectations, political support or constraints, the local geology and hydrology, and many other factors. Visit the opens in a new windowSustainable Sanitation and Water Management Toolbox to learn more about sanitation systems and technologies.